2.0 KiB

Raw Blame History

META — Known Issues (workspace meta-tooling)

For planned/actionable work see META_TODO.md.

Active issues for the workspace meta-tooling itself: protocol stack, skills, registry conventions, .github/ files. Distinct from code-domain topics (LOG, BIN, SIG, etc.) which track code/feature concerns.

In scope

Skill correctness or coverage gaps (docs-discovery, docs-check, protocol-audit, adr-author, docs-archive)
Registry / convention drift (REPO_PREFIXES.md, TOPIC_CODES.md, protocol-audit/references/REPOS.md)
Protocol-stack inconsistencies (Rule #1-6 wording, @repo block format, ID-format edge cases)
.github/ infrastructure issues (folder structure, file naming conventions, generation rules)
ADR / Decision Log governance issues (e.g., Current protocol state summary staleness)

Out of scope

Code-domain issues (those go to LOG_ISSUES.md, BIN_ISSUES.md, etc.)
One-off historical events — those go to LLM_PROTOCOL_DECISIONS.md as decisions
Forward-looking work that has been formally decided — that's a TODO (META_TODO.md) not an issue

Active entries

(No ACCORE-META-I-* entries yet — file just created (LLMP-DEC-62). Add the first entry below as concrete issues are observed.)

Issue entry template

## ACCORE-META-I-XXXX: Short title

**Severity:** Trivial / Low / Minor / Major / Critical · **Status:** Open / InProgress / Closed (YYYY-MM-DD) · **Area:** <skill / registry / convention name>

### Description
What's broken or inconsistent in the meta-tooling, with quotable evidence (file path + line number, or skill behaviour).

### Root cause
Why it's like that.

### Fix direction
Proposed approach.

### Resolution
(Filled when Status moves to `Closed` — what / where / why per `TOPIC_CODES.md` Status conventions.)

### Related
- Sibling: `META_TODO.md#accore-meta-t-xxxx` (if applicable)
- Cross-topic: `<other-topic>_ISSUES.md#accore-...` (if domain-spillover)
- LLMP-DEC: `LLMP-DEC-N` (if a decision documents the resolution)

2.0 KiB Raw Blame History